![]() The aim of this review was to compare the effectiveness of interventions to improve activities of daily living in people with complex psychosis and related severe mental illnesses. See the literature search strategy in appendix B and study selection flow chart in appendix C. One study compared manual based staff training intervention (Rehabilitation Effectiveness for Activities for Life) designed to increase patients’ engagement in activities to standard care ( Killaspy 2015). One study compared targeted cognitive training program to treatment as usual ( Thomas 2018). One study ( Edgelow 2011) compared occupational time use intervention to TAU. One study compared social skills training to TAU ( Bartels 2014) and 1 other compared social skills training to psychosocial occupational therapy control ( Liberman 1998). One study ( Leclerc 2000) compared rehabilitative coping skills module employing problem solving and cognitive behavioural therapy to treatment as usual (TAU). The included studies are summarised in Table 2. Six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified for this review ( Bartels 2014, Edgelow 2011, Killaspy 2015, Leclerc 2000, Liberman 1998 and Thomas 2018) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |